Discussion Post: Week 12

19 Comments

Another week down, with a dozen more presentations in the books! Hopefully this week we’ll finish up Persuasive Presentation I. Our odds are certainly quite a bit better now, at the very least.

Let’s start this week’s discussion with a bit of controversy. A recent archaelogical find is already being called “the major discovery of Christian history.” A set of 70 lead codices — basically, stone books — were discovered in a remote Jordanian cave five years ago, and some scholars now believe they could hold clues to the last days of Jesus’ life. Of course, a tense conflict is brewing over ownership of the credit card-sized codices, but given that initial metallurgical tests indicate that they are about 2,000 years old, they could be landmark finds indeed. Or perhaps they’re just a two millenia-old shopping list. What are your thoughts on these scrolls? Do you buy the claims that they have deep religious significance? How about scientific tests of their authenticity? For that matter, what do you think about the interaction between science and religion in general? Are they mutually exclusive entities or easily blended? What is the role of the scientist, as you see it, pertaining to religion?

In Spain, researchers from a small company called Bio Fuel Systems are working on mixing carbon dioxide and algae to promote the production of fossil fuels identical to those naturally created millions of years ago. According to engineer Eloy Chapuli, “We are trying to simulate the conditions which existed millions of years ago, when the phytoplankton was transformed into oil. In this way, we obtain oil that is the same as oil today.” There is speculation that this alternative fossil fuel could be available for public consumption in 5-10 years, representing an alternative to limited natural fossil fuels, electric power which demands lengthy vehicle charging, and nuclear power which, given the ongoing crisis in Japan, the public is less apt to support. Do you think that this alternative is as promising as many seem to think? How might it change the world around us and the subjects of major concern to us? By the same token, is this an ideal solution to possible energy crises, or are there problems with this alternative? What do you think should be done in the energy industry — and what plans do you think will actually be implemented?

In other world news, Libyan rebels are trying to hold recent gains after six weeks of fighting against Moammar Gadhafi’s forces, although the U.S. says it has no plans to send ground troops as support. NATO air strikes have had mixed results; a recent effort against Gadhafi’s army accidentally killed 13 rebel troops instead. The violence in Syria has also continued, with dissidents being seized from their homes and at least nine demonstrators killed and dozens more injured by security forces on Friday. That hasn’t slowed down protests, which continued on Saturday, inspiring some shops to close “in solidarity with with the protesters.” Attacks in Afghanistan have also recently increased, with seven U.N. staff killed on Friday and a suicide attack in Kabul on Saturday. The Taliban in claiming no responsibility, with a representative instead saying that “it was a pure act of responsible Muslims” in response to a March 20 Koran burning by Florida pastor Terry Jones. As for the Japanese nuclear crisis, Japan’s Prime Minister says that officials may have discovered why radiation has been leaking into the sea: according to Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), a crack in a concrete pit at the No. 2 reactor in Fukushima has been leaking water, releasing radiation at a rate of 1,000 millisieverts per hour. TEPCO staff have begun pouring concrete into the leak in an effort to limit further damage.

Okay, we’ll talk about the NCAA tournament one last time (unless Butler wins it all, in which case I’ll be obligated to at least mention it next week). Let’s return to the student-athlete dilemma first. Consider the superstars of college hoops who ultimately use the NCAA as a minor league of sorts on their way to professional basketball (or other sports, for that matter). What does that mean for the college scene that they leave behind (especially if they enter the pros before finishing four years of school), both on the court and in the classroom? As a student-athlete, how do you weigh the money from immediately jumping to the pros against the education of the last 1-3 years in college? On the university level, do the millions of dollars earned from collegiate athletics outweigh the (probably slight) decline in graduation rates or any social phenomena that may unfold around student-athletes who have little intention of finishing their degrees? What about coaches who make more money than anyone else at their university? Taking it to the larger organizational level, does it benefit the NCAA or the NBA to establish a minor league system akin to that of Major League Baseball? Why or why not? What about allowing NCAA athletes to be paid, as some have suggested? Would the benefits of such a change outweigh the drawbacks? And what about renewed allegations of NCAA rules violations by staff on two of the Final Four teams?

Finally, in stupid-internet-posting news, on Thursday a New Jersey first-grade teacher was suspended without pay for saying that “she felt like a warden overseeing future criminals.” Apparently the post spurred a large group of parents to demand her removal from what is, to be fair, one of New Jersey’s most troubled school systems. She’s hardly the first teacher to be suspended for online comments; a Pennsylvania high school teacher was recently suspending following similar comments on her blog, and a Chicago second-grade teacher is facing disciplinary actions after posting and mocking one of her student’s school photos on Facebook. What are your thoughts on these recent incidents? Should internet activity be used against employees in their real-world lives? I know that some of you have expressed interest in primary education, so what do you think about these teachers and their behavior? For that matter, how does the crossover between online activity and real-world consequences relate to the Rebecca Black story we discussed last week?

As always, please feel free to discuss any of the above or below stories, or post on another topic of your choice, if you prefer!

Other articles of interest:
Snooki Earns Higher Speaking Fee Than Toni Morrison
Google v Microsoft: Oi! You looking at me?
One-Armed Surfing Star Says Upcoming Biopic Is ‘Spot On’
BCS conducts shallow probe as party rages on
How did the tradition of cutting down the nets begin?
Israel, The Third Nation on the Moon?
AP-GfK Poll: Americans souring more on economy
President Obama intervenes in budget standoff
More US Women Having Children With Different Biological Fathers
Loophole means Utah sex offender set to be freed
New census data shows which areas of America are growing, shrinking
No ring? Will and Kate break from tradition, along with more couples
Rebecca Black’s Not To Blame: Meet The Man Who Wrote “Friday”
Stephen Colbert & Jimmy Fallon Sing Rebecca Black’s ‘Friday’

Discussion Post: Week 4

19 Comments

Hi, all! As a quick note, if you’re having any trouble reading the comments on your presentation — which I understand, given the handwriting — I’ll be happy to go over them with you during my office hours or by appointment. The same goes for all future assignments for our class.

Given the timing of this weekend and the textbook we’re using for this class, I thought it would be appropriate to start this week’s discussion post by taking a step back in time to Apple’s famous “1984” Super Bowl advertisement. The commercial was revolutionary in its time, but most people aren’t aware that Apple executives hated the advertisement and tried to cancel it. (For those of you who have not seen the ad, a copy is embedded within the linked article.) What are your thoughts on the advertisement? What would you have done if you had to approve or reject it? What made it so great, and what about it could have turned into a catastrophe?

The internet officially ran out of IP addresses last week. Things should still be fine for at least a few months, according to most analysts, but there will ultimately have to be a change from the IPv4 format to IPv6. How do you think this will affect internet use, if at all? Could it derail internet browsers and other tools that rely on the IPv4 format? Given how long the IPv4 format has been used, how can the new format be effectively distributed across regions and countries? Should we expect any resistance or hesitation to conform?

Earlier this week, Apple made headlines by rejecting a prominent Sony application from its App Store without a clear reason. It turns out that Apple is tightening its policies in an attempt to receive some of the profits from publishers who use the iPad to distribute content like books and magazines. Some consumers and companies are concerned that this will force changes to a number of existing and future apps to avoid similar rejection. Likewise, Apple is gambling that publishers will be willing to share profits rather than abandon the App Store. What are your thoughts on this issue?

We certainly can’t let this week pass without looking at this evening’s Steelers-Packers showdown. It’s official: the Pittsburgh Steelers win Super Bowl XLV!

…According to Madden 11, anyway. The video game simulated the matchup last week and predicted a back-and-forth battle, resulting in a 24-20 victory and Pittsburgh’s seventh Super Bowl win. Laugh if you like, but Madden has a strong track record with Super Bowl predictions since they started in 2004; in seven years, it has only missed one prediction (the Giants’ 2008 comeback against New England). It’s also been fairly close on some of the scores, particularly over the last couple of years. Every few years sports analysts return to the discussion of sabermetrics, or the prediction of sports outcomes based on individual and team histories and other available statistics. What do you think about the accuracy of video games for gameplay and predictions? How do you foresee the future of such simulations, whether in the sports realm, the social sphere, or other processes like chemical reactions and aerodynamics?

On a more somber note, a recent research study showed that the risk of cardiac arrest significantly increases following a Super Bowl loss by one’s favored team. The study itself is significant, but it might also be helpful to consider three different ways of reporting the research. How are they different? Why are they different? Would you have reported the study any differently?

Of course, we can’t end this post without returning to the story that’s been all over the news: Egypt. U.S. President Obama and Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak have both voiced their approval for current Egyptian Vice President Omar Suleiman leading an Egyptian transition toward democracy. While this technically satisfies the demands for Mubarak’s departure, concerns remain among protesters and human rights activists about the integrity of that democracy, as Suleiman has not indicated that he will stop the policy of imprisoning political opponents. All things considered, will this be enough to curtail the current violence? Do you think this will be an improvement for the citizens of Egypt or not? How will this affect the international tensions within and beyond the Middle East?

Other articles of interest:
Fifth grader gets to report on Super Bowl XLV
Hackers Penetrate Nasdaq’s Computers
Facebook, Twitter Fans To Decide Fate of Barbie and Ken
‘Small’ iPad 2 introduction event later this month; launch in March: report
Meet Watson, the computer set to outsmart the champions of Jeopardy!
(related, from Week 1, IBM computer taking on ‘Jeopardy’ champs)